William Blagrave's short replication to Christopher Babham's answer simply asserts that all his own previous statements are true, and that Babham's are so 'imperfect, uncertian, and insufficient' that they require no further response.
| Name | Event Role(s) | Document Role(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Hammerton, Stephen | apprentice | |
| Babham, Christopher | defendant | company manager |
| Blagrave, William | plaintiff | Master of Revels, deputy |